Earnings season is revealing an important disconnect: some companies are delivering strong growth, rising revenue, improving cash flow, and higher guidance, yet their stocks are still under pressure. Alphabet, Meta, Mercado Libre, Uber, and Axon show why short-term market reactions can sometimes obscure stronger underlying fundamentals. For a long-term investor, the opportunity is not simply finding stocks that beat expectations—it is identifying businesses that continue getting stronger even when the market temporarily loses confidence.

Most marketers learn digital marketing by doing it — trial, error, and hoping it sticks. But when your pipeline depends on it, there's no room for guesswork.

HubSpot Academy's Digital Marketing Certification covers everything that moves the needle: SEO that actually gets you found, email strategies that convert, social media and paid ads that reach the right audience, and AI tools that make your team faster without adding headcount.

3 hours and 24 minutes. 10 lessons. 30 videos. Free.

Join 200,000+ certified professionals who have built sharper strategies — and the skills to prove ROI to leadership — with HubSpot Academy.

Get certified today. No cost. No credit card.

Get Certified Free

One fund offers a 41%+ distribution—but its lifetime return is nowhere close to supporting it. Another pays less than 5% yet delivers a much wider margin of safety.

What if a falling stock is actually hiding a stronger business? This earnings season offers a closer look at five companies where market sentiment and business performance are moving in different directions—and why that gap could create opportunities for patient investors.

Let’s embark on this transformative journey together and position your portfolio for success in this evolving market landscape!

Be sure to read through to the end to catch all the valuable insights this newsletter delivers to your inbox today.

Think about investing $500 into $RYTM ( ▼ 2.28% ) stock every month and following the strong growth path it has taken over the past five years. The chart shows the price rising from about $14 five years ago to $115.63 today. That equals a 734% total gain, averaging around 53% growth each year.If the next five years continue with similar performance, your dollar-cost averaging plan could produce strong results. Here are the key figures:

This steady buying method helps you acquire shares at different price points, which can improve your average cost while staying focused on the longer upward trend. The stock has traded near that high recently, showing strength even as it experiences normal market movements.

The practical side of this approach is how simple and consistent it stays. You keep adding the same amount each month without needing to time every shift. Past performance offers a useful guide, though future results are never certain. For those aiming to grow savings through regular effort, RYTM has demonstrated the kind of progress that can reward patient investors who stick with the plan over time.

For someone looking for the next major long-term winner, the hardest part is not finding a company with an exciting story. It is determining whether the growth opportunity is large enough to justify the price you are paying today.

That is exactly what makes SpaceX $SPCX ( ▼ 3.93% ) such a fascinating—and controversial—case.

At an estimated valuation of about $1.75 trillion, SpaceX is already one of the world's most valuable private companies. At that price, calling it a potential multibagger sounds aggressive. Yet the argument is not based solely on rockets, Starlink, or Elon Musk's ambitious forecasts. The more interesting possibility is that SpaceX could evolve into a major AI infrastructure and compute company, creating an entirely different valuation framework.

The key question for you is simple: Can the business grow into its valuation fast enough to leave room for substantially higher returns?

Peter Lynch's concept of a multibagger remains useful because it focuses attention on business growth rather than short-term stock movements.

A company growing earnings or revenue at roughly 20% annually can become dramatically larger over a decade because of compounding. If that growth is combined with an expansion in the valuation multiple, the result can become extraordinary.

But there is an important catch: buying a great company at an excessive valuation can eliminate much of the potential upside.

That is why valuation matters so much with SpaceX.

At roughly $1.75 trillion, the company needs enormous revenue growth to justify another several-fold increase in value. A future valuation of $5 trillion, for example, would require a business that is dramatically larger and more profitable than it is today.

This is where the AI infrastructure opportunity becomes important.

SpaceX generated approximately $7.8 billion in second-quarter revenue, representing 92% year-over-year growth, while adjusted EBITDA increased 191% to about $3.54 billion.

The business is already divided into several major engines.

Starlink, the connectivity operation, generated approximately $4.29 billion in revenue, up 66% year over year, with operating income of roughly $1.65 billion. The service reached approximately 12 million subscribers, adding 1.7 million customers during the quarter.

The launch business generated about $962 million, with 38 launches during the quarter and 485 metric tons of payload delivered to orbit.

But the segment that could change the entire investment story is AI infrastructure.

AI infrastructure revenue reached approximately $2.56 billion, growing 247% year over year. Compute capacity increased from roughly 0.4 gigawatts to 1.4 gigawatts, with more than 2 gigawatts targeted by the end of 2026.

That is a dramatic change in the company's profile.

Instead of thinking about SpaceX simply as a launch company with a satellite internet business attached, investors increasingly have to consider whether it can become a large-scale provider of AI compute.

The biggest bull case revolves around a highly ambitious target: reaching approximately 10 gigawatts of compute capacity by the end of 2027.

That would require SpaceX to add roughly 6–8 gigawatts during 2027 alone.

The capital requirements would be enormous. Estimates discussed in the source material place the potential investment at roughly $300 billion to $500 billion, depending on the cost per megawatt and how quickly the infrastructure is deployed.

That is not a normal expansion plan.

For comparison, Microsoft $MSFT ( ▼ 0.45% ), Amazon $AMZN ( ▼ 2.09% ), and Google $GOOGL ( ▼ 3.84% ) are already spending enormous amounts on data-center infrastructure. Their combined capital expenditures have reached hundreds of billions of dollars, supported by established cloud businesses generating substantial recurring revenue.

SpaceX would be attempting to compress a similar infrastructure buildout into a much shorter period.

That is precisely why the opportunity is so attractive—and so risky.

If SpaceX reaches 10 gigawatts and successfully monetizes that capacity, its revenue potential could be enormous. If the company struggles to deploy the infrastructure, secure customers, or generate acceptable returns on that capital, the current valuation becomes much harder to defend.

SpaceX does not have to build the AI business entirely from scratch.

The company has reportedly secured major compute commitments involving Google and Anthropic, providing early evidence that external customers are willing to use its infrastructure.

Google has reportedly contracted for approximately 110,000 Nvidia $NVDA ( ▼ 0.02% ) GPUs, while Anthropic has committed substantial spending toward dedicated compute capacity.

However, these agreements should not be treated as guaranteed long-term revenue. The reported contracts contain termination provisions, meaning customers have flexibility if their infrastructure requirements change.

That distinction matters.

For a long-term investor, signed contracts are encouraging, but the real proof will come from renewals, utilization rates, margins, and sustained customer demand.

The question is not whether SpaceX can sell compute today. It is whether it can repeatedly sell enormous amounts of compute profitably.

TLDR AI is the free daily brief curated by Anthropic and ex-Google engineers. The stories, models, and research they'd send a colleague, summarized for 1.1M+ readers.

Subscribe for free

SpaceX's potential rise as an AI infrastructure provider should not automatically be viewed as bad news for existing players.

In fact, it could demonstrate something much more important: AI demand may be significantly larger than current infrastructure can handle.

That would have implications for Nvidia, Microsoft, Amazon, Google, Meta, Oracle, CoreWeave, Nebius, and Iris Energy.

If SpaceX suddenly needs hundreds of billions of dollars of GPUs, networking equipment, power infrastructure, and data-center components, those purchases represent demand flowing through the broader AI ecosystem.

Nvidia could benefit directly because SpaceX relies heavily on its GPUs.

Microsoft could benefit if additional compute capacity allows Azure and its AI products to expand faster.

Amazon and Google remain major beneficiaries of the broader cloud-AI spending cycle, while Meta continues investing heavily in AI infrastructure despite not operating a traditional cloud business.

Meanwhile, CoreWeave $CRWV ( ▲ 2.42% ) and Nebius $NBIS ( ▲ 4.95% ) are more directly exposed to the AI-cloud opportunity. Their biggest risk is not simply that SpaceX becomes successful; it is whether they can maintain healthy margins, control financing costs, and continue bringing new capacity online fast enough to meet demand.

That distinction is important for your portfolio.

A larger SpaceX does not automatically mean a smaller CoreWeave or Nebius. It could instead signal that the entire compute market is expanding faster than expected.

This is where discipline matters.

A $1.75 trillion valuation already assumes an enormous amount of future success. SpaceX still needs to prove that it can execute a massive data-center expansion while maintaining attractive economics.

The 10-gigawatt target is ambitious. The revenue scenarios attached to it are even more ambitious.

Some projections suggest SpaceX could eventually reach a $300 billion-plus annualized revenue run rate from compute. That would be transformational, but these figures are scenarios—not guarantees.

The infrastructure must actually be built.

Power must be secured.

GPUs must be deployed.

Customers must remain.

Utilization must be high.

And most importantly, the economics must justify the capital being invested.

There is also execution risk surrounding SpaceX's broader ambitions, including Starship. Any long-term thesis involving large-scale space infrastructure ultimately depends on the company's ability to make its launch system increasingly reliable and economical.

There is another reason SpaceX stands apart from companies such as Rocket Lab $RKLB ( ▼ 0.04% ), Tesla $TSLA ( ▲ 0.58% ), or traditional AI infrastructure providers.

If SpaceX successfully develops the technology required for large-scale space operations, it could eventually control multiple layers of the emerging space economy: launch, satellites, communications, and potentially space-based infrastructure.

That is still a long-term possibility rather than an established business.

The same applies to concepts such as space-based data centers. They may become commercially important over the next five to ten years, but there is no guarantee that the economics will work or that deployment will happen on the expected timeline.

That is why the investment case should be separated into what exists today and what might exist tomorrow.

Today, SpaceX has a rapidly growing launch business, a large Starlink operation, and an emerging AI infrastructure business.

Tomorrow could look dramatically different—but investors should not pay today's price based entirely on tomorrow's possibilities.

The most interesting lesson here is not simply whether SpaceX is a buy.

It is understanding what has to happen for a multibagger thesis to work.

SpaceX would need extraordinary revenue growth, successful AI infrastructure deployment, strong customer demand, efficient capital spending, and eventually higher profitability. If those pieces come together, the company's current valuation could eventually look much more reasonable.

If they do not, $1.75 trillion leaves considerably less room for error.

For someone already exposed to Nvidia, Microsoft, Amazon, Google, Meta, CoreWeave, Nebius, Oracle, or Iris Energy, SpaceX is also worth watching because it could become a powerful indicator of the next phase of AI infrastructure demand.

The smartest approach is not to chase the most exciting story.

It is to watch the numbers that prove whether the story is becoming reality: compute capacity, revenue growth, customer contracts, utilization, capital expenditure, margins, and free cash flow.

That is where a potential multibagger stops being a fascinating narrative and starts becoming an investable business.

Ready to Revolutionize Your Wealth?

Here's what's waiting for you:

As the world becomes increasingly digital, this question will be on the minds of millions seeking new income streams in 2026.

The answer is—Absolutely!

Thank you for taking the time to read today’s email! Your support is what allows me to send out this newsletter for free every day. 

 What do you think of the new format? Please provide your feedback in the poll below, and if you find the newsletter valuable, feel free to share it with other investors!

Disclaimer: This newsletter is for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Please consult with a financial advisor before making any investment decisions.