AI stocks are falling, but not every company caught in the selloff is facing the same problems. Some are dealing with genuine financial pressure, while others continue to report strong demand, expanding backlogs, and growing business opportunities. The market is shifting its focus from AI potential to measurable results, making company fundamentals more important than ever.

Five businesses deserve a closer look: AMD is expanding across AI accelerators and server CPUs, Micron is benefiting from demand for advanced memory, Astera Labs and Credo Technology are supplying essential connectivity solutions, and Oracle is investing heavily in the cloud infrastructure needed to support AI workloads. Each offers a different way to participate in the AI expansion, but each also carries risks involving competition, valuation, customer commitments, or capital requirements. A lower share price alone does not make an investment attractive. The real opportunity depends on whether these companies can turn growing AI demand into sustainable earnings and cash flow.

🔍 Discover what is driving the investment cases for AMD, MU, ALAB, CRDO, and ORCL, and how semiconductor, technology, and broad-market ETFs can provide different levels of AI exposure.

More importantly, learn which business developments could help distinguish long-term opportunities from speculative bets.

Imagine setting aside $500 a month for $HWM ( ▲ 1.3% ) for five years, buying a fixed dollar amount on a schedule, a method called dollar-cost averaging. In our example the buy happens on the first trading day on or after the 9th of each month, from Dec 2021 through Nov 2026 (the first buy lands on Thursday, Dec 9, 2021, and the last on Monday, Nov 9, 2026): 60 buys, $30,000 in total.

Caution: past pace rarely continues. HWM's Oct 29, 2026 release for the third quarter showed revenue up 29% year over year to $2.70 billion and adjusted EBITDA up 43% to $879 million and net income of $567 million, up from $385 million, with full-year 2026 guidance raised.

A step to watch: HWM's highest close of the past year was $292.65 on Aug 18, 2026; it dipped to $185.91 on Oct 23, 2026 and recovered to $216.24 by Nov 9, 2026, a reminder that prices can pause even while the business keeps growing.

AI stocks are falling sharply, and the market is once again questioning whether the massive investment in artificial intelligence can deliver the returns companies are promising. Concerns about data center construction, political resistance, rising capital expenditures, and slowing demand have created a wave of selling across the sector.

But a falling share price does not automatically mean a company's business is deteriorating. Some companies are facing genuine financial or execution challenges, while others are delivering strong results despite being caught in the same market-wide selloff.

That distinction matters more than trying to predict exactly when the market will recover.

The AI investment cycle is also changing. The early phase rewarded companies simply associated with artificial intelligence. Investors bought the promise of future growth, often without knowing which businesses would ultimately generate sustainable revenue. Now, the market is demanding evidence: stronger earnings, growing backlogs, customer commitments, and products that are becoming essential to AI infrastructure.

For investors building a long-term portfolio, this shift creates an opportunity to look beyond market sentiment and identify businesses with measurable demand. Five companies stand out in this discussion: Advanced Micro Devices, Micron Technology, Astera Labs, Credo Technology, and Oracle. Each operates in a different part of the AI ecosystem, which also creates several ways to approach the opportunity through ETFs.

One concern weighing on AI stocks is the possibility that political opposition could slow data center development. Local communities and policymakers are increasingly questioning the energy consumption, infrastructure requirements, and environmental impact of large data center projects. Potential restrictions or project cancellations could affect companies expecting continued expansion.

However, not every proposed data center is expected to be built. Large infrastructure projects require years of planning, financing, approvals, and construction. Companies generally account for delays and cancellations when developing their expansion plans.

The more important question is whether projects that have already secured approval and funding are moving forward and generating demand for equipment.

That is where the distinction between speculation and execution becomes important. Companies supplying processors, memory, and connectivity equipment are already reporting meaningful business activity. Their future performance will depend on whether that demand translates into sustained revenue, stronger margins, and cash flow.

A broad market selloff can temporarily push strong companies down alongside weaker businesses. But that does not make every declining AI stock a bargain. Investors still need to examine each company's financial position, growth drivers, valuation, and ability to deliver on its commitments.

Advanced Micro Devices $AMD ( ▲ 1.3% ) is increasingly important to the AI infrastructure market because its opportunity extends beyond graphics processing units (GPUs).

The company is competing in the accelerator market with its MI450 products and Helios platform. Its data center business recently delivered approximately 100% growth, while management indicated that demand could support further acceleration in the coming quarters.

The opportunity is not limited to GPUs. AI systems also need central processing units (CPUs), particularly as workloads shift from training models toward inference, the process of using trained AI models to generate responses and complete tasks.

As AI adoption expands, the balance between CPUs and GPUs inside data centers may change. The discussion cited a potential shift toward a closer one-to-one CPU-to-GPU ratio, compared with historical configurations that used several CPUs for each GPU. If that trend continues, AMD could benefit from demand across both categories.

This gives AMD two potential growth drivers: AI accelerators and server CPUs. Its ability to compete in both markets could make it a broader beneficiary of data center investment than companies dependent on a single product category.

The recent earnings discussion also pointed to management's expectations for strong growth, including the possibility of growth reaching or exceeding 80% in the following year. Those expectations remain forecasts, not guaranteed results. Competition, product execution, customer adoption, and supply availability will determine how much of that opportunity becomes actual revenue.

Micron Technology $MU ( ▼ 1.1% ) is another company facing a sharp selloff despite a strong long-term demand outlook.

The immediate concern discussed in the source involves a delay to one of Micron's expansion projects in Taiwan because of labor disputes. Any delay in manufacturing capacity can create uncertainty around future revenue targets and the industry's ability to supply enough memory for AI systems.

However, a delayed project does not necessarily mean demand has weakened. It may instead postpone additional supply, potentially extending the period during which memory manufacturers benefit from tight market conditions.

Micron's importance comes from its position in both conventional DRAM and high-bandwidth memory (HBM). These products are essential to modern AI infrastructure. GPUs require fast memory to process large volumes of information, while data centers need substantial DRAM capacity to support servers and increasingly demanding workloads.

The source also highlights Micron's order visibility. Its demand is reportedly committed through the end of the following year and into the latter part of 2028, with visibility extending further into the next decade. Such commitments provide a stronger foundation than relying entirely on short-term customer orders.

Another reason investors are watching Micron is its valuation. The discussion cited a forward price-to-earnings ratio below nine, based on the estimates available at the time. That may appear inexpensive for a company benefiting from AI infrastructure spending, but memory manufacturers have historically traded at low earnings multiples near the peak of a cycle. Investors may be anticipating that unusually strong profits will eventually decline as new capacity enters the market.

The key question is whether AI demand can make this cycle more durable than previous memory booms. Growing inference workloads, continued data center construction, and long-term customer commitments support that possibility. Still, Micron remains exposed to the industry's cyclical nature, and a supply-demand imbalance can change quickly.

AI infrastructure is not simply a collection of powerful GPUs. Those processors must communicate efficiently with CPUs, memory, networking equipment, and other components inside a data center.

That is where Astera Labs $ALAB ( ▼ 0.32% ) comes in.

The company develops connectivity technology that helps link the components inside advanced computing systems. As AI clusters become larger and more complex, moving information between processors and other hardware becomes increasingly important. Even powerful chips cannot deliver their full potential if data cannot move between them efficiently.

Astera's opportunity is tied to the growing complexity of AI systems. The source describes strong demand for existing products, a transition toward next-generation products, expanding production, and accelerating customer backlogs. These developments suggest that its business is participating in the actual deployment of AI infrastructure rather than simply benefiting from the industry's expectations.

However, the stock's valuation and volatility deserve attention. The discussion noted that Astera had fallen approximately 50% in a month, after trading near $500 at the end of June before declining below $200. Such a dramatic move shows how quickly expectations can change when a high-growth stock becomes vulnerable to market sentiment.

Even if the company's business remains strong, investors who purchased at elevated valuations may need time for earnings growth to catch up with the share price.

For a long-term investor, the important distinction is between a temporary decline caused by changing sentiment and a deterioration in the company's competitive position. Astera's future depends on maintaining its role in customer product cycles, successfully delivering next-generation technology, and converting its backlog into revenue.

Credo Technology $CRDO ( ▼ 2.33% ) operates in a related part of the AI infrastructure market, focusing on high-speed connectivity solutions that help data move between computing systems.

As AI clusters expand, the connections between servers and processors become increasingly important. Copper-based solutions remain useful in many applications, while optical technology is becoming more important as data centers require higher bandwidth and longer-distance connections.

Credo's investment case is built around its relationships with major technology companies and its position within established product cycles. Once a supplier's technology is integrated into a customer's system, it may have opportunities to participate in subsequent generations of that platform.

That can create a longer commercial relationship than simply selling a component for one hardware release. As customers upgrade their systems, suppliers that meet performance and reliability requirements may continue receiving orders.

The source also points to Credo's investments in optical connectivity, which could position the company as data center architectures evolve beyond traditional copper connections.

However, the stock has experienced a major correction, with the discussion citing a decline of approximately 45% over the previous month. The company's long-term opportunity does not eliminate the risks associated with valuation, customer concentration, competition, and the timing of new product deployments.

Credo's business needs to demonstrate that strong partnerships and product adoption can translate into sustained earnings growth. Its share price may remain volatile while investors reassess how much future growth is already reflected in its valuation.

Oracle $ORCL ( ▼ 1.51% ) is different from the other four companies because its opportunity comes from building and operating the cloud infrastructure needed to support AI workloads.

The company has an established software and database business, but its AI ambitions require substantial investment in data centers and computing capacity. That spending has created concerns about debt, dilution, capital expenditures, and free cash flow.

These concerns should not be dismissed. Building infrastructure before it generates revenue can place pressure on a company's finances, particularly when projects require significant borrowing and long construction timelines.

At the same time, Oracle has a substantial backlog of contracted business. The source describes that backlog as approaching $1 trillion, reflecting demand for future cloud and AI infrastructure capacity. A large backlog can provide revenue visibility, but it is not the same as cash already received. Oracle still needs to build the capacity, satisfy customer requirements, and convert those commitments into recognized revenue and cash flow.

The bullish argument rests on the possibility that Oracle is approaching a transition point. After investing heavily in infrastructure, the company may begin monetizing more of that capacity. Management has also outlined expectations for capital expenditure growth to reach a ceiling, followed by improving cash flow as new infrastructure becomes productive.

If that transition happens as planned, Oracle could move from a period of heavy investment toward stronger financial returns. That would help address one of the market's biggest concerns.

But execution remains critical. If construction is delayed, customer demand changes, or financing costs remain elevated, the pressure on cash flow could last longer than expected. Oracle is therefore a more complicated investment than a company selling components into the AI buildout. Its opportunity is substantial, but so are its capital requirements.

The five companies represent different parts of the AI ecosystem, and that distinction can help investors build a more balanced approach.

AMD and Micron provide exposure to computing and memory hardware. Astera Labs and Credo focus on connectivity, which helps increasingly complex AI systems communicate. Oracle represents the cloud infrastructure and data center investment required to deliver AI services at scale.

Rather than choosing a single company, investors can use ETFs to spread exposure across several businesses. The key is understanding what each fund actually owns.

Semiconductor ETFs: SMH and SOXX

The VanEck Semiconductor ETF $SMH ( ▼ 0.78% ) and iShares Semiconductor ETF $SOXX ( ▼ 0.12% ) provide exposure to semiconductor companies across the industry. They can offer access to chip designers, manufacturers, and other businesses supporting semiconductor demand.

However, both funds can be heavily influenced by their largest holdings. Investors should compare their company weights and overlap rather than assuming that owning two semiconductor ETFs automatically creates diversification.

Broad Technology ETFs

Technology-focused funds can provide exposure beyond semiconductor manufacturing, including companies involved in software, cloud services, and enterprise technology. This can help introduce businesses with different revenue models into a portfolio.

Oracle is an example of why this matters. Its investment case depends on infrastructure spending, cloud demand, financing, and cash flow rather than simply selling semiconductor components.

Diversified Market ETFs

A broad-market ETF can provide another layer of diversification by holding companies across multiple industries. This may reduce the impact of a downturn concentrated in AI and semiconductor stocks, although it will also dilute direct exposure to the AI theme.

For investors who already own several individual AI stocks, adding another narrowly focused ETF may increase concentration instead of reducing it. The better approach is to review the combined exposure across individual stocks and funds.

The recent AI selloff is a reminder that even companies with strong growth prospects can experience substantial declines when expectations become too high or market sentiment turns negative.

AMD needs to continue expanding its position in AI accelerators and server CPUs. Micron must manage the memory cycle while converting strong demand into sustainable earnings. Astera Labs and Credo need to maintain their positions as AI connectivity requirements evolve. Oracle must turn its enormous backlog and infrastructure investments into revenue and stronger cash flow.

These businesses do not carry identical risks, and their share prices may not recover at the same time. A company with strong demand can still be a poor investment if its valuation assumes too much future growth. Likewise, a stock that has fallen sharply is not automatically undervalued.

For a long-term portfolio, the most useful signal is not simply a green trading day after a period of losses. It is evidence that business performance remains on track: improving revenue, growing backlogs, successful product launches, healthy customer demand, and better cash generation.

Today's card stock, Howmet Aerospace, shows that kind of measurable demand: its Oct 29, 2026 results had revenue up 29% and net income up 47%, the evidence worth tracking through any selloff.

Ready to Revolutionize Your Wealth?

Here's what's waiting for you:

As the world becomes increasingly digital, this question will be on the minds of millions seeking new income streams in 2026.

The answer is—Absolutely!

Thank you for taking the time to read today’s email! Your support is what allows me to send out this newsletter for free every day. 

 What do you think of the new format? Please provide your feedback in the poll below, and if you find the newsletter valuable, feel free to share it with other investors!

Disclaimer: This newsletter is for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Please consult with a financial advisor before making any investment decisions.