Quantum computing is no longer just a lab experiment—it’s an emerging investment frontier. This newsletter dives into two pioneers, IonQ and Rigetti, comparing their growth, cash burn, and runway, while exploring the risks and potential rewards of betting on the future of computing. Learn how to position your portfolio for a technology that could redefine industries—and decide whether to step in early or watch from the sidelines.

Let’s embark on this transformative journey together and position your portfolio for success in this evolving market landscape!

Be sure to read through to the end to catch all the valuable insights this newsletter delivers to your inbox today.

There are moments when technology feels less like an industry and more like a revolution in waiting. Quantum computing is one of those moments. Investors scanning the horizon for “the next big thing” after artificial intelligence are beginning to realize that this field could redefine computing power, security, and problem-solving at a scale impossible for today’s machines.

But here’s the tension you face: quantum computing isn’t ready for everyday business use. Not yet. What exists today is a collection of research partnerships with governments, universities, and a handful of corporations. Revenue is lumpy, unpredictable, and often tied to short-term contracts. Yet despite all that uncertainty, fortunes are already being made and lost on early bets.

Two names dominate that conversation: IonQ and Rigetti Computing. Both are pioneers. Both are risky. And both are asking investors to see beyond today’s volatility toward a future that could be worth tens — even hundreds — of billions of dollars.

$IONQ ( ▼ 0.74% ) Q has established itself as the frontrunner. Revenue has soared from $2.1 million in 2021 to $52.4 million today — a more than 25-fold jump in just three years. That kind of growth makes investors take notice, even if the numbers themselves are still tiny compared to established tech firms.

But scale comes at a cost. IonQ’s research team is expanding aggressively, and talent at this level isn’t cheap. In the past year alone, the company burned through $144 million in operating cash flow, up from just $16 million the year prior. That means IonQ is spending nearly three times more than it earns.

The balance sheet, however, gives them breathing room. With $140 million in cash reserves, IonQ has roughly a year of runway at its current burn rate. Every milestone it hits — new breakthroughs, better systems, fresh partnerships — gives it the ability to raise additional capital at favorable terms. For a company like IonQ, time is the single most valuable asset, and right now, it still has time on its side.

$RGTI ( ▼ 0.13% ) path looks different. Once hailed as a quantum contender, its revenues tell a story of fits and starts. From $200,000 in 2019, Rigetti shot up to $13 million in 2022, only to slide back to $7.9 million in the most recent twelve-month period. It’s not a collapse — it’s the nature of depending on contracts that can vanish as quickly as they arrive.

Its cash burn is more modest than IonQ’s, averaging around $50 million annually for the past three years. On the surface, that looks disciplined. But when compared to revenue, Rigetti is burning more than seven times its top line, versus IonQ’s three times. Put simply: Rigetti is leaner, but also less efficient in converting dollars spent into growth achieved.

The company holds about $57 million in cash, roughly equivalent to one year of survival under current conditions. Like IonQ, Rigetti is betting that it can string together enough milestones to raise more funding and keep the lights on until commercial adoption arrives.

With neither company profitable, investors rely on relative metrics like EV-to-Sales to gauge value. By that yardstick, IonQ trades at roughly 200 times sales, while Rigetti sits at more than 530 times sales. For perspective, even fast-growing AI firms trade at far lower multiples.

This highlights a truth every investor must internalize: these are not safe plays. These are venture-style bets on the public market. The upside is enormous if either company matures into a commercial powerhouse. But the downside is equally stark — larger players like IBM, Microsoft, and Alphabet are building their own quantum initiatives, and their scale could leave smaller firms like IonQ and Rigetti struggling to capture market share.

The long-term potential is unquestionable. Quantum computing could one day break problems in drug discovery, cybersecurity, logistics, and climate modeling wide open. That kind of utility translates into markets worth hundreds of billions. The question is whether these small, early-stage firms will be alive — and competitive — when that market finally arrives.

For investors like you, the takeaway isn’t about picking a guaranteed winner. There is no guarantee here. What exists is a choice about risk tolerance, patience, and vision.

This is not an investment for someone looking for stability or short-term income. It’s an investment for someone willing to wait a decade or more, absorbing turbulence along the way, in hopes of standing at the front of the line when quantum moves from the lab to the boardroom.

Quantum computing is not a matter of if. It’s a matter of when. The only real question for you is this: do you want to be an early backer, embracing the uncertainty in exchange for a shot at generational upside, or do you prefer to let the giants of tech absorb the risk and join the party later, when the path is clearer but the rewards are smaller?

That decision — to enter early or to wait — is the essence of investing at the edge of innovation.

Ready to Revolutionize Your Wealth?

Here's what's waiting for you:

With the world becoming increasingly digital, this question will be on the minds of millions of people looking for new income streams in 2025.

The answer is—Absolutely!

Thank you for taking the time to read today’s email! Your support is what allows me to send out this newsletter for free every day. 

 What do you think of the new format? Please provide your feedback in the poll below, and if you find the newsletter valuable, feel free to share it with other investors!

Disclaimer: This newsletter is for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Please consult with a financial advisor before making any investment decisions.